Jefferson republican v. Hamilton federalist




Authors contacts:

Word count:

Jefferson Republican v. Hamilton federalist

At around the 1990s, a conflict between the Republicans and Federalists parties took a new shape. By then, Alexander Hamilton was the Federalist leader while Thomas Jefferson was leading the Republicans. The two parties were reasonably consistent; their following was relatively stable and fashionable, and continuing organizations. Interests of trade and manufacturing were the primary concern for the Federalists since they saw them as the driving forces of progress in the world. Hamilton and his fellow Federalists believed that establishing a strong and capable central government could have seen them advance. The government was to create a stable currency as well as establishing sound public credit. In other words, Hamilton yearned for a centralized government with extensive powers, more profoundly in the executive. On the contrary, Thomas Jefferson was anticipating a minimum central government, where the state controls the majority of its power . Jefferson and Hamilton served as Secretary of State and Secretary of the Treasury, respectively, in President George Washington administration. The aims at expounding on similarities and differences of the Federalists and Republicans about social economic and political philosophies.

Alexander Hamilton was arguably the brainchild of ideology and public policy for the Federalists even though he was unsuccessful in mastering the widespread appeal to vie for an elective office. The quest for efficiency, order, and organization is what Hamilton brought to public life. The House of Representatives called Hamilton to respond on the matter relating to adequate support for public credit. His strategy was committed and supported public economy policies and effective government. Hamilton was keen at pinpointing how their industrial development and commercial activity deserved credit and that the people should have complete faith and support on government operations . A large number of people wanted to repudiate the Confederation’s national debt or even recompense a significant part of it. Instead, Hamilton emphasized full repayment based on the federal government plan concerning the state’s unpaid debts incurred at the time of Revolution. All the measures aimed to place the federal government on a firm foundation inspired commerce and industry, and the national government was firmly behind the creation of a solid phalanx of interests. The New England State was its political stronghold.

Thomas Jefferson and his fellow Republicans primarily concentrated and spoke about agricultural interests and values. His regime distrusted bunkers, give little attention to commerce and manufacturing, and that a rural society with self-sufficient farmers could flourish democracy and freedom the best . There was little need for a stable administration in their view; they saw a strong central government as a potential source of oppression. Republicans drew their support from the South. Hamilton aimed a more elaborate and efficient organization since he was afraid of anarchy. In the early stages of the French Revolution, Jefferson served as a minister to France and looked to unseat the French monarchy as the redemption of the enlightenment liberal ideals. Shortly after Jefferson assumed the office as secretary of state, the clash between the two orchestrated a new and profoundly important Constitution interpretation. As Hamilton was introducing his bill to create a national bank, Jefferson strongly opposed and argued that all the powers belonging to the federal government were expressly enumerated by the constitution and reserved the other power to the states . In other words, the federal government had no power to set up a bank.

To summarize, the Republicans under the leadership of Jefferson held an ambivalent take on slavery as they believed the institution was immoral. Jefferson was, however, hypocritical on the same as he objected immediate release of all slaves regarding economic grounds. In his lifetime, he managed to free only two slaves and privately advocated the colonization of domestic slaves. Also, Hamilton was passionately against institutions of slavery, but a conflict of interest always stood whenever his central political tenet concerning property rights and prompted Hamilton to allow those motivations . The two parties held similar opinions concerning slavery. The fact that both Federalists and Republicans antislavery words were barely the empty partisan rhetoric aimed at gaining control over the national government led to the slavery debate in the Antebellum period.


“50 Core Documents That Tell America’s Story – Teaching American History”. 2020. Teaching American History.

2020. Constitutionfacts.Com.

2020. Liberalarts.Utexas.Edu.

adress, User, and U.S. Senate. 2020. “User Clip: Washington’s Farewell Adress”. C-SPAN.Org.

Malone, Kathryn R., James Madison, Robert A. Rutland, and Thomas A. Mason. 1983. “The Papers Of James Madison, Vol. 14: 6 April 1791-16 March 1793”. Journal Of The Early Republic 3 (4): 488. doi:10.2307/3122890.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

× How can I help you?