Introduction and Summary

Introduction and Summary

Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
EDL-861 EDL-861-O500 Literature Review: Introduction and Summary 175.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Introduction to the Literature Review 20.0% The introduction to the literature review is either missing or does not address all of the required components. The introduction to the literature review incompletely or inaccurately describes the topic under investigation and the importance of the study to the field. It does not describe how the study addresses or extends something that is not known and/or will fill a gap in the literature or research. The introduction to the literature review provides a cursory description of the topic under investigation and the importance of the study to the field. It vaguely describes how the study addresses or extends something that is not known and/or will fill a gap in the literature or research. The introduction to the literature review describes the topic under investigation, presents the importance of the study to the field, and describes how the study addresses or extends something that is not known and/or will fill a gap in the literature or research. The introduction to the literature review clearly and thoroughly describes the topic under investigation, presents the importance of the study to the field, and describes how the study addresses or extends something that is not known and/or will fill a gap in the literature or research.
Revised Body of the Literature Review 20.0% The revised body of the literature review is either missing or does not address all of the required components. The revised body of the literature review incompletely or inaccurately discusses what has been published on the topic and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature and current research. There is no connection to the proposed study, and no synthesis of the information in each theme. The revised body of the literature review provides a cursory discussion of what has been published on the topic and vaguely evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature and current research. It lacks a strong connection to the proposed study and only partially synthesizes the information in each theme. The revised body of the literature review provides a discussion of what has been published on the topic, evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature and current research, makes a strong connection to the proposed study, and synthesizes the information in each theme. The revised body of the literature review provides a comprehensive and thorough discussion of what has been published on the topic, evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature and current research, makes a strong connection to the proposed study, and fully synthesizes the information in each theme.
Inclusion of Instructor Feedback in the Revised Body of the Literature Review 10.0% The revised body of the literature review does not include instructor feedback. The revised body of the literature review incompletely or inaccurately includes instructor feedback. The revised body of the literature review includes instructor feedback though it does not integrate well with the existing writing. The revised body of the literature review integrates instructor feedback moderately well with the existing writing. The revised body of the literature review seamlessly integrates instructor feedback with the existing writing.
Summary to the Literature Review 20.0% The summary to the literature review is either missing or does not address all of the required components. The summary to the literature review incompletely or inaccurately summarizes the gaps and opportunities in the literature that is the focus of the current study, describes how the study will extend the literature and research based on the topic, and explains how the study will add value to the existing body of knowledge. The summary to the literature review provides a cursory summary of the gaps and opportunities in the literature that is the focus of the current study, a vague description of how the study will extend the literature and research based on the topic, and an uninformed explanation of how the study will add value to the existing body of knowledge. The summary to the literature review summarizes gaps and opportunities in the literature that is the focus of the current study, describes how the study will extend the literature and research based on the topic, and identifies how the study will add value to the existing body of knowledge. The summary to the literature review clearly and thoroughly summarizes gaps and opportunities in the literature that is the focus of the current study, describes how the study will extend the literature and research based on the topic, and identifies how the study will add value to the existing body of knowledge.
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Total Weightage

The post Introduction and Summary appeared first on Homeworkshine.

No matter what kind of paper writing service you need, we’ll get it written. Place Your Order Now!