Excellent use of creditable sources. Accurate referencing. Obvious that outstanding effort made Extremely good effort

Total 50

Page 5 of 5

BN208 Networked Application Assignment 2 Page 5 of 5

Prepared by: Mr. Ameet Kumar Moderated by: Dr. Fariza Sabrina August, 2018

Marking Rubric for Assignment #2: Total Marks 50

Grade Mark

HD 40-50 DI 35-39 CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail <25

Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Introduction /5

All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is

Topics are relevant and soundly analysed.

Generally relevant and analysed.

Some relevance and briefly presented.

This is not relevant to the assessment topic.

Task-1 /20

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately

demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately

Demonstrate d ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately

Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately

Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately

Task-2 /10

Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments

Consistency logical and convincing

Mostly consisten and logical

Adequate cohesion and conviction

Argument is confused and disjointed

Reporting /5

All elements are present and very well integrated.

Components present with good cohesive

Components present and mostly well integrated

Most components present

Proposal lacks structure.

Conclusion /5

Excellent use of creditable sources. Accurate referencing. Obvious that outstanding effort made

Extremely good effort

Good effort made but not outstanding

Made some effort. For example, Web searches only

Very little attempt to reference. Lazy effort with inaccuracies

Reference style /5

Clear styles with excellent source of references.

Clear referencing style

Generally good referencing style

Sometimes clear referencing style

Lacks consistency with many errors